SHA-512 Generator
SHA-512 of any text or file. 128 hex characters per hash. Slightly higher security margin than SHA-256, and on 64-bit hardware, typically faster.
When SHA-512 beats SHA-256
- 64-bit servers hashing large files — SHA-512 saturates 64-bit memory pipelines better, often 1.5–2× faster.
- Higher security margin — twice the output bits means the collision-finding work doubles in exponent. Both are safe today; SHA-512 has more headroom.
- Long-term archival — for hashes you want to remain meaningful in 30+ years, SHA-512 has more buffer against unknown future attacks.
When SHA-256 wins
- Human-readable contexts — Git commits, filenames, URLs. 64 hex chars is already long; 128 is unwieldy.
- 32-bit or constrained hardware — SHA-256 is faster.
- Compatibility with existing protocols — most JWT, TLS, and codesigning tooling defaults to SHA-256.
SHA-512/256 — the best of both?
There's a variant called SHA-512/256: run SHA-512 internally, then truncate the output to 256 bits. You get SHA-512's 64-bit performance with SHA-256's output size. It's used in some newer systems but isn't widely supported in standard libraries — Web Crypto doesn't expose it directly. This page implements plain SHA-512.
For developers
Native API:
const bytes = new TextEncoder().encode("hello tooljo");
const buf = await crypto.subtle.digest("SHA-512", bytes);
const hex = Array.from(new Uint8Array(buf))
.map(b => b.toString(16).padStart(2, "0")).join(""); Other algorithms
See all algorithms at once, focused SHA-256, or legacy MD5 tools. For "which one should I use," read our guide on hash function selection.
FAQ
How long is a SHA-512 hash?
512 bits = 64 bytes = 128 hex characters. Or about 88 base64 characters (86 unpadded base64url).
Is SHA-512 actually faster than SHA-256?
On 64-bit hardware, often yes. SHA-512 operates on 64-bit words natively, while SHA-256 uses 32-bit words. On modern x86-64 / ARM64 / Apple Silicon, hashing the same data with SHA-512 is roughly 1.5–2× faster than SHA-256. On 32-bit hardware (rare today), SHA-256 wins.
Why don't more systems default to SHA-512 then?
Output size. 128 hex characters is unwieldy in places where a hash is shown to humans (commit IDs, filenames, URLs). 64 is already pushing it. For machine-to-machine, SHA-512 is often the better choice; for human-readable contexts, SHA-256 wins on ergonomics.
Are SHA-512 and SHA-512/256 different?
Yes. SHA-512 produces a 512-bit output. SHA-512/256 (truncated SHA-512) produces a 256-bit output but uses the SHA-512 algorithm internally — useful when you want SHA-256-sized output but SHA-512 internal performance. This tool implements plain SHA-512.